To better grasp the cut-throat reality of venture capital, we can look at the data from 1986 to 2018 that was generously shared by the long-playing fund of funds VenCap. As Michael Sidgemore aptly pointed out, "If thereβs a chart that captures the power of the power law, itβs this one." A mere 1.1% β equivalent to 121 companies β out of the 11,350 companies involved in the underlying fund yielded fund-return results.
Put simply, even seasoned institutional investors find it challenging to pinpoint promising startups, a task that becomes even more daunting for angels. The determinative question in this selection process is: How much is a startup worth (or can be worth), and, therefore, how much investment should the current round receive?
In most cases, angel investors will just be offered to follow the terms set by the founders and approved by the lead investor, leaving little to no room for negotiation on valuation. But you should still understand where the numbers come from, so we've put together some basic rules for pre-seed/seed assessment.
Navigating the maze of pre-money valuation involves a critical choice: Do you base it on analogs or embrace the startup's uniqueness? Do you rely on ongoing sales or project future cash flows? These questions linger, and each investor charts their own course.
Here are a few tried-and-true options:
What's the point?
This method hinges on projecting the startup's value at the time the investor exits the company. Two key indicators play a vital role: pre-investment and post-investment assessments (factoring in the duration until the investor exits).
What are the steps?
Let's break it down with a little example:Β
If a startup is supposed to be worth $150 million in three years, aiming for an ROI of 30%, crunch the numbers like this: $150 million / (1 + 0.30)^3. So, the estimated pre-money valuation using the Venture Capital Method hovers around $68.3 million.Β
What's the point?
This method adopts a qualitative approach by breaking down a pre-seed stage startup's value into five crucial components, each valued at up to $500,000. These components are idea, team, prototype, partnerships, and rollout.
It's a handy tool, especially for vertical startups where assessing the market and prospects is more straightforward. Keep in mind, though, that this method requires careful consideration due to its subjective nature.Β
What are the steps?
What's the point?
This method is a concoction of quantitative and qualitative characteristics. It's about putting the startup side by side with very similar ones β same location, same phase, same playing field. The criteria used to compare can vary.
What are the steps?
Of course, we've only scratched the surface. Various methods, such as Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCF) and Risk Factor Summation (RFS), also fit most situations when it comes to early valuations.Β
For more full-grown companies with in-depth financial data, the 409A valuation will define fair market value. Beware, though β this approach is way more challenging, as it demands a nuanced understanding of equity, debt, and other complex factors.
Here are some guiding principles that stand tall, no matter which valuation route you take:
And above all, meticulously scrutinize all the information provided by the founders. Avoid situations where the startup appears impressive on the pitch deck but falters in practice, akin to the rice vending machine meme. Make sure the innovation isn't just adding complexity like those viral gym-goers doing things the hard way.
Cover image: Unsplash
Uniborn is a community-led platform for sourcing, sharing, syndicating, and amplifying startups.
Uniborn is a trade name of Uniborn OΓ, registry code 16515953, Rotermanni 6, Tallinn, 10111, Estonia.
We are not intended to be a substitute for legal, tax or financial advice.
Uniborn OΓ is licensed by the Estonian FIU as Trust and Company Service provider, operating license FIU000420.